Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Court recognised a procedural failure in timely filing Form 10B under the Income Tax Act but treated it as a curable irregularity where substantial entitlement to tax exemption exists. The administrative Circular relied upon by the respondent was not treated as binding on the court. Applying the principle that technical non-compliance should not defeat substantive benefits to a trust or institution, the court condoned a short delay in filing Form 10B and allowed the petitioner to retain benefits under Sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act.
Court recognised a procedural failure in timely filing Form 10B under the Income Tax Act but treated it as a curable irregularity where substantial entitlement to tax exemption exists. The administrative Circular relied upon by the respondent was not treated as binding on the court. Applying the principle that technical non-compliance should not defeat substantive benefits to a trust or institution, the court condoned a short delay in filing Form 10B and allowed the petitioner to retain benefits under Sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
