Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Cross country pipeline classification and ITC entitlement: pipelines outside factory treated as immovable, ITC disallowed under Section 17 restriction...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6181 to 6200 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addressing disputed purchases and commission claims, the note holds that where sales and business are accepted, purchases cannot be treated as wholly non-existent and an addition should be limited to the profit element; accordingly purchases from two suppliers (where statutory notices were unserved) were estimated at the declared gross profit rate of 6.5% to account for possible embedded profit and price inflation. Separately, commission and brokerage payments were held allowable where primary documentary evidence (ledgers, bills, bank payments, TDS proof) was produced and no independent adverse material or enquiries proved the payments were sham, so full disallowance was not justified.
Addressing disputed purchases and commission claims, the note holds that where sales and business are accepted, purchases cannot be treated as wholly non-existent and an addition should be limited to the profit element; accordingly purchases from two suppliers (where statutory notices were unserved) were estimated at the declared gross profit rate of 6.5% to account for possible embedded profit and price inflation. Separately, commission and brokerage payments were held allowable where primary documentary evidence (ledgers, bills, bank payments, TDS proof) was produced and no independent adverse material or enquiries proved the payments were sham, so full disallowance was not justified.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.