Maintainability of a Section 7 insolvency petition against a financial service provider denied; appeal dismissed for non maintainability and complex d...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6201 to 6220 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Profiteering under the GST regime was found where the Respondent accepted the DGAP-calculated excess and complainants withdrew complaints; the Tribunal directs the Respondent to pass on the profiteered amount of Rs.98,72,474 to homebuyers and to pay applicable interest under Rule 133(3)(b) of the CGST Rules, 2017, with compliance reporting to the jurisdictional CGST/SGST Commissioner and DGAP within prescribed timelines. The Tribunal also holds that penalty under the post 2020 penalty provision applies because the contravention period spans 01.07.2017 to 31.03.2024, making penalty leviable under the applicable statutory provision for profiteering.
Profiteering under the GST regime was found where the Respondent accepted the DGAP-calculated excess and complainants withdrew complaints; the Tribunal directs the Respondent to pass on the profiteered amount of Rs.98,72,474 to homebuyers and to pay applicable interest under Rule 133(3)(b) of the CGST Rules, 2017, with compliance reporting to the jurisdictional CGST/SGST Commissioner and DGAP within prescribed timelines. The Tribunal also holds that penalty under the post 2020 penalty provision applies because the contravention period spans 01.07.2017 to 31.03.2024, making penalty leviable under the applicable statutory provision for profiteering.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
