Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
441 to 460 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Condonation of delay in filing appeals against AAR orders is limited to a maximum extension of 30 days beyond the normal 30 day appeal period; the Appellate Authority (AAAR) lacks power to extend beyond that statutory window, so appeals filed beyond that limit must be rejected as time barred without consideration of merits. Rule permitting manual filing where electronic filing is prescribed does not excuse delay caused by non uploading of an order on the portal. The note also records the classificatory issue that transactions in immovable property may be outside Schedule III but treated as a service under Schedule II clause 5(e), though merits were not reached due to time bar.
Condonation of delay in filing appeals against AAR orders is limited to a maximum extension of 30 days beyond the normal 30 day appeal period; the Appellate Authority (AAAR) lacks power to extend beyond that statutory window, so appeals filed beyond that limit must be rejected as time barred without consideration of merits. Rule permitting manual filing where electronic filing is prescribed does not excuse delay caused by non uploading of an order on the portal. The note also records the classificatory issue that transactions in immovable property may be outside Schedule III but treated as a service under Schedule II clause 5(e), though merits were not reached due to time bar.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
