Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Advance ruling maintainability and ITC eligibility are considered for construction of foundations and structural supports for heavy machinery. The Explanation to section 17 treats foundation and structural supports as part of ''plant and machinery'' (excluding land, buildings and similar civil structures), making them potentially eligible for ITC when used for outward supplies. The application lacked documentary proof on ITC eligibility, payment, availing and filings, and the works were completed before the AAR application; because advance rulings apply only to supplies being undertaken or proposed, the authority declined to rule on the merits.
Advance ruling maintainability and ITC eligibility are considered for construction of foundations and structural supports for heavy machinery. The Explanation to section 17 treats foundation and structural supports as part of ''plant and machinery'' (excluding land, buildings and similar civil structures), making them potentially eligible for ITC when used for outward supplies. The application lacked documentary proof on ITC eligibility, payment, availing and filings, and the works were completed before the AAR application; because advance rulings apply only to supplies being undertaken or proposed, the authority declined to rule on the merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.