Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
Examines application of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act to proceeds derived from predicate offences, holding that use of criminal proceeds in construction constitutes money laundering attracting PMLA liability and attachment. Emphasises money laundering as a continuing offence, the statutory presumption shifting burden to the accused in money laundering prosecutions, and the distinctness of the PMLA offence from scheduled/predicate offences (so no double jeopardy), permitting concurrent sentences. Notes the retrospective and overriding effect of PMLA and affirms conviction on the trial court record based on oral and documentary evidence establishing possession, acquisition and use of proceeds.
Examines application of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act to proceeds derived from predicate offences, holding that use of criminal proceeds in construction constitutes money laundering attracting PMLA liability and attachment. Emphasises money laundering as a continuing offence, the statutory presumption shifting burden to the accused in money laundering prosecutions, and the distinctness of the PMLA offence from scheduled/predicate offences (so no double jeopardy), permitting concurrent sentences. Notes the retrospective and overriding effect of PMLA and affirms conviction on the trial court record based on oral and documentary evidence establishing possession, acquisition and use of proceeds.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.