Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Reopening of assessment under the new regime requires supplying to the taxpayer the materials forming the basis for reopening; where only a notice and reasons recorded were provided without annexed material, the taxpayer was deprived of an effective opportunity to respond and the subsequent order under the new procedure was invalidated. The note emphasises that failure to furnish underlying information precludes meaningful representation and renders the reopening notice defective, aligning with higher-court guidance that materials must be disclosed before final action is taken.
Reopening of assessment under the new regime requires supplying to the taxpayer the materials forming the basis for reopening; where only a notice and reasons recorded were provided without annexed material, the taxpayer was deprived of an effective opportunity to respond and the subsequent order under the new procedure was invalidated. The note emphasises that failure to furnish underlying information precludes meaningful representation and renders the reopening notice defective, aligning with higher-court guidance that materials must be disclosed before final action is taken.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.