Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
501 to 520 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reopening of assessment under the new regime requires supplying to the taxpayer the materials forming the basis for reopening; where only a notice and reasons recorded were provided without annexed material, the taxpayer was deprived of an effective opportunity to respond and the subsequent order under the new procedure was invalidated. The note emphasises that failure to furnish underlying information precludes meaningful representation and renders the reopening notice defective, aligning with higher-court guidance that materials must be disclosed before final action is taken.
Reopening of assessment under the new regime requires supplying to the taxpayer the materials forming the basis for reopening; where only a notice and reasons recorded were provided without annexed material, the taxpayer was deprived of an effective opportunity to respond and the subsequent order under the new procedure was invalidated. The note emphasises that failure to furnish underlying information precludes meaningful representation and renders the reopening notice defective, aligning with higher-court guidance that materials must be disclosed before final action is taken.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.