Minimum Import Price restrictions for Black Pepper, Areca-nuts and Apples upheld; procedural laying failure not fatal, notifications to be placed befo...
Transaction value between related persons requires market-equivalent pricing; importer must prove declared value mirrors ordinary international trade ...
Classification of exported insecticides under export tariff affirmed; reclassification and related penalties set aside and MEIS scrip jurisdiction rec...
Misclassification between copra and dry coconut: customs recovery and re-valuation quashed for lack of prior licensing-authority invalidation, appeals...
Applications for amendment of bills of entry under Section 149 and claims for refund under the Customs Act require fresh adjudication: the tribunal held that rejection of refund claims was unsustainable where appellants had self-assessed and cleared goods under RMS without consideration of exemption eligibility, and remitted matters to the adjudicating authority to consider amendment applications and entitlement to exemptions/concessional duty under Notification No.25/2002-Cus (as amended), Notification No.08/2004-Cus, and specified 2012 notifications for BCD, CVD and SAD, and to reassess refund claims after such amendments.
Applications for amendment of bills of entry under Section 149 and claims for refund under the Customs Act require fresh adjudication: the tribunal held that rejection of refund claims was unsustainable where appellants had self-assessed and cleared goods under RMS without consideration of exemption eligibility, and remitted matters to the adjudicating authority to consider amendment applications and entitlement to exemptions/concessional duty under Notification No.25/2002-Cus (as amended), Notification No.08/2004-Cus, and specified 2012 notifications for BCD, CVD and SAD, and to reassess refund claims after such amendments.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
