Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Appellate remand power under Section 107(11) was challenged and the court found that the appellate authority's practice of remitting matters back to the adjudicating authority is impermissible; consequently the court refused to direct the writ petitioner to pursue relief before the GST appellate forum. The court noted connected orders dated 28.06.2024 and 31.05.2024 which remanded matters back and held such remands not permissible under law, and therefore declined the objection seeking relegation to the appellate tribunal for adjudication.
Appellate remand power under Section 107(11) was challenged and the court found that the appellate authority's practice of remitting matters back to the adjudicating authority is impermissible; consequently the court refused to direct the writ petitioner to pursue relief before the GST appellate forum. The court noted connected orders dated 28.06.2024 and 31.05.2024 which remanded matters back and held such remands not permissible under law, and therefore declined the objection seeking relegation to the appellate tribunal for adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
