Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Appellate remand power under Section 107(11) was challenged and the court found that the appellate authority's practice of remitting matters back to the adjudicating authority is impermissible; consequently the court refused to direct the writ petitioner to pursue relief before the GST appellate forum. The court noted connected orders dated 28.06.2024 and 31.05.2024 which remanded matters back and held such remands not permissible under law, and therefore declined the objection seeking relegation to the appellate tribunal for adjudication.
Appellate remand power under Section 107(11) was challenged and the court found that the appellate authority's practice of remitting matters back to the adjudicating authority is impermissible; consequently the court refused to direct the writ petitioner to pursue relief before the GST appellate forum. The court noted connected orders dated 28.06.2024 and 31.05.2024 which remanded matters back and held such remands not permissible under law, and therefore declined the objection seeking relegation to the appellate tribunal for adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.