Intermediary service classification fails where overseas admission facilitation is supplied independently, preserving export treatment and small-provi...
Satellite transponder bandwidth is telecommunication, not Business Support Service; foreign non-telegraph providers triggered no service tax liability...
Commitment proceedings gain extended timelines, structured defect refiling, and automatic resumption of inquiry after the adjusted completion period e...
Centralised assessment transfer becomes unwarranted once the searched person's assessment is complete, requiring restoration to the appropriate charge...
Appellate remand power under Section 107(11) was challenged and the court found that the appellate authority's practice of remitting matters back to the adjudicating authority is impermissible; consequently the court refused to direct the writ petitioner to pursue relief before the GST appellate forum. The court noted connected orders dated 28.06.2024 and 31.05.2024 which remanded matters back and held such remands not permissible under law, and therefore declined the objection seeking relegation to the appellate tribunal for adjudication.
Appellate remand power under Section 107(11) was challenged and the court found that the appellate authority's practice of remitting matters back to the adjudicating authority is impermissible; consequently the court refused to direct the writ petitioner to pursue relief before the GST appellate forum. The court noted connected orders dated 28.06.2024 and 31.05.2024 which remanded matters back and held such remands not permissible under law, and therefore declined the objection seeking relegation to the appellate tribunal for adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.