Revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 upheld; faceless assessments subject to revision when AO fails requisite enquiries, remitted for fresh asse...
Limited scope of processing under section 143(1): enhancement without show cause is unsustainable; remand for residency, taxation and TDS verification...
Requirement that an appeal be accompanied by the prescribed fee is a mandatory statutory condition, but where the substantive payment was made within time and only documentary proof (challan) was not produced, that omission is a curable procedural defect; compliance in substance satisfies the statutory requirement and dismissal for non-furnishing of proof without adjudication on merits is inappropriate. The note emphasises that procedural prescriptions serve justice and should not defeat substantive rights, and that issues on denial of exemption under section 11 and Form 10B versus Form 10BB remain unexamined and require adjudication on merits.
Requirement that an appeal be accompanied by the prescribed fee is a mandatory statutory condition, but where the substantive payment was made within time and only documentary proof (challan) was not produced, that omission is a curable procedural defect; compliance in substance satisfies the statutory requirement and dismissal for non-furnishing of proof without adjudication on merits is inappropriate. The note emphasises that procedural prescriptions serve justice and should not defeat substantive rights, and that issues on denial of exemption under section 11 and Form 10B versus Form 10BB remain unexamined and require adjudication on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.