Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Page of 4821
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1541 to 1560 of 96406 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Appellate tribunal found the Commissioner (Appeals) erred by not...
Misdeclaration of quantity rejected where supplier evidence established counting errors, so reassessment, confiscation and redemption fine were set aside.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Appellate tribunal found the Commissioner (Appeals) erred by not examining the importer's explanation and supplier communication showing errors in quantification of imported memory components; therefore the upheld duty reassessment, confiscation and redemption fine were set aside. The tribunal also held that compulsory registration under the Electronics and IT Goods order applies to standalone UPS/inverters, not spare parts; consequently absolute confiscation and the small penalty imposed for one power supply were set aside and the two power supplies ordered released without penalty.
Appellate tribunal found the Commissioner (Appeals) erred by not examining the importer's explanation and supplier communication showing errors in quantification of imported memory components; therefore the upheld duty reassessment, confiscation and redemption fine were set aside. The tribunal also held that compulsory registration under the Electronics and IT Goods order applies to standalone UPS/inverters, not spare parts; consequently absolute confiscation and the small penalty imposed for one power supply were set aside and the two power supplies ordered released without penalty.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.