Misdeclaration of quantity rejected where supplier evidence established counting errors, so reassessment, confiscation and redemption fine were set as...
Admissibility of electronic evidence controls valuation and penalty exposure; non compliant e records and statements nullify revaluation and penalties...
Appellate tribunal found the Commissioner (Appeals) erred by not...
Misdeclaration of quantity rejected where supplier evidence established counting errors, so reassessment, confiscation and redemption fine were set aside.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Appellate tribunal found the Commissioner (Appeals) erred by not examining the importer's explanation and supplier communication showing errors in quantification of imported memory components; therefore the upheld duty reassessment, confiscation and redemption fine were set aside. The tribunal also held that compulsory registration under the Electronics and IT Goods order applies to standalone UPS/inverters, not spare parts; consequently absolute confiscation and the small penalty imposed for one power supply were set aside and the two power supplies ordered released without penalty.
Appellate tribunal found the Commissioner (Appeals) erred by not examining the importer's explanation and supplier communication showing errors in quantification of imported memory components; therefore the upheld duty reassessment, confiscation and redemption fine were set aside. The tribunal also held that compulsory registration under the Electronics and IT Goods order applies to standalone UPS/inverters, not spare parts; consequently absolute confiscation and the small penalty imposed for one power supply were set aside and the two power supplies ordered released without penalty.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
