Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Appellate tribunal found the Commissioner (Appeals) erred by not...
Misdeclaration of quantity rejected where supplier evidence established counting errors, so reassessment, confiscation and redemption fine were set aside.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Appellate tribunal found the Commissioner (Appeals) erred by not examining the importer's explanation and supplier communication showing errors in quantification of imported memory components; therefore the upheld duty reassessment, confiscation and redemption fine were set aside. The tribunal also held that compulsory registration under the Electronics and IT Goods order applies to standalone UPS/inverters, not spare parts; consequently absolute confiscation and the small penalty imposed for one power supply were set aside and the two power supplies ordered released without penalty.
Appellate tribunal found the Commissioner (Appeals) erred by not examining the importer's explanation and supplier communication showing errors in quantification of imported memory components; therefore the upheld duty reassessment, confiscation and redemption fine were set aside. The tribunal also held that compulsory registration under the Electronics and IT Goods order applies to standalone UPS/inverters, not spare parts; consequently absolute confiscation and the small penalty imposed for one power supply were set aside and the two power supplies ordered released without penalty.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
