Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Importer liability extends to IEC holders who imported goods...
Admissibility of electronic evidence controls valuation and penalty exposure; non compliant e records and statements nullify revaluation and penalties.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Importer liability extends to IEC holders who imported goods regardless of beneficial ownership, limiting joint demands to imports against each IEC. Redetermination of transaction value under the Customs Valuation Rules was invalid where based solely on proforma invoices or statements without compliance with the CVR and statutory procedures, so departmental revaluation and related duty demands were set aside. Electronic printouts and statements relied on by the Department were excluded for non compliance with statutory certification and examination requirements, rendering valuation and penalty claims unsustainable. Post import tampering of retail price stickers falls within excise machinery where established; penalties require mens rea and were not proved here.
Importer liability extends to IEC holders who imported goods regardless of beneficial ownership, limiting joint demands to imports against each IEC. Redetermination of transaction value under the Customs Valuation Rules was invalid where based solely on proforma invoices or statements without compliance with the CVR and statutory procedures, so departmental revaluation and related duty demands were set aside. Electronic printouts and statements relied on by the Department were excluded for non compliance with statutory certification and examination requirements, rendering valuation and penalty claims unsustainable. Post import tampering of retail price stickers falls within excise machinery where established; penalties require mens rea and were not proved here.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.