Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1201 to 1220 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Authority to appoint a third party developer for completion of predominantly completed residential projects is sustained where protection of home buyers is the predominant consideration; the appellate tribunal's direction to bring in a government entity for completion is not found unfair or contrary to insolvency law and is upheld with specified modifications. Use of the court's equitable remedial power to ensure completion and orderly distribution is endorsed, permitting surplus distribution to other claimants by pari passu or other fair mechanisms. Interim injunctions that would impede the court approved completion mechanism are prohibited; the appeals are dismissed accordingly.
Authority to appoint a third party developer for completion of predominantly completed residential projects is sustained where protection of home buyers is the predominant consideration; the appellate tribunal's direction to bring in a government entity for completion is not found unfair or contrary to insolvency law and is upheld with specified modifications. Use of the court's equitable remedial power to ensure completion and orderly distribution is endorsed, permitting surplus distribution to other claimants by pari passu or other fair mechanisms. Interim injunctions that would impede the court approved completion mechanism are prohibited; the appeals are dismissed accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.