Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Authority to appoint a third party developer for completion of predominantly completed residential projects is sustained where protection of home buyers is the predominant consideration; the appellate tribunal's direction to bring in a government entity for completion is not found unfair or contrary to insolvency law and is upheld with specified modifications. Use of the court's equitable remedial power to ensure completion and orderly distribution is endorsed, permitting surplus distribution to other claimants by pari passu or other fair mechanisms. Interim injunctions that would impede the court approved completion mechanism are prohibited; the appeals are dismissed accordingly.
Authority to appoint a third party developer for completion of predominantly completed residential projects is sustained where protection of home buyers is the predominant consideration; the appellate tribunal's direction to bring in a government entity for completion is not found unfair or contrary to insolvency law and is upheld with specified modifications. Use of the court's equitable remedial power to ensure completion and orderly distribution is endorsed, permitting surplus distribution to other claimants by pari passu or other fair mechanisms. Interim injunctions that would impede the court approved completion mechanism are prohibited; the appeals are dismissed accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.