Inventory write-off and fraudulent/wrongful trading allegations in corporate insolvency led to director liability principles applied and appeal dismis...
Condonation of delay in filing GSTR-3B returns and entitlement to Section 62 benefit results in withdrawal of assessments and revocation of attachment...
Classification dispute over an agro-product: the article identifies the legal issue as whether low percentages of N, P, K render those elements non-essential and thus the product falls under a general chemical heading rather than fertiliser. It notes heavy reliance on an incomplete laboratory test report and that the appellate order failed to address invocation of the extended limitation period. The piece records remand to the adjudicating authority for fresh classification adjudication, direction to resolve outstanding lab-query and limitation points, and to decide afresh observing principles of natural justice within six months.
Classification dispute over an agro-product: the article identifies the legal issue as whether low percentages of N, P, K render those elements non-essential and thus the product falls under a general chemical heading rather than fertiliser. It notes heavy reliance on an incomplete laboratory test report and that the appellate order failed to address invocation of the extended limitation period. The piece records remand to the adjudicating authority for fresh classification adjudication, direction to resolve outstanding lab-query and limitation points, and to decide afresh observing principles of natural justice within six months.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.