Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Continuing offence of money-laundering: discharge set aside and proceedings reinstated where laundering continued after inclusion of predicate offence...
Dispute concerns eligibility for the DTVSV Scheme, 2024 where the petitioner failed to deposit the amount specified in Form-3 and contends that this default triggers automatic revival of previously withdrawn revision petitions. The court applied the principle of automatic revival of prior adverse orders upon failure of a statutory declaration, restoring the parties to their pre-declaration positions and holding the respondents' refusal (based on no pending revision petitions) to be legally erroneous. The impugned order is set aside; petitioner is directed to approach respondents within thirty days to complete formalities to avail the scheme for tax arrears and penalty.
Dispute concerns eligibility for the DTVSV Scheme, 2024 where the petitioner failed to deposit the amount specified in Form-3 and contends that this default triggers automatic revival of previously withdrawn revision petitions. The court applied the principle of automatic revival of prior adverse orders upon failure of a statutory declaration, restoring the parties to their pre-declaration positions and holding the respondents' refusal (based on no pending revision petitions) to be legally erroneous. The impugned order is set aside; petitioner is directed to approach respondents within thirty days to complete formalities to avail the scheme for tax arrears and penalty.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
