Mis-declaration and Concealment: confiscation affirmed, transaction value re-determined and mandatory penalty sustained; redemption allowed on payment...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5561 to 5580 of 96208 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Dispute concerns eligibility for the DTVSV Scheme, 2024 where the petitioner failed to deposit the amount specified in Form-3 and contends that this default triggers automatic revival of previously withdrawn revision petitions. The court applied the principle of automatic revival of prior adverse orders upon failure of a statutory declaration, restoring the parties to their pre-declaration positions and holding the respondents' refusal (based on no pending revision petitions) to be legally erroneous. The impugned order is set aside; petitioner is directed to approach respondents within thirty days to complete formalities to avail the scheme for tax arrears and penalty.
Dispute concerns eligibility for the DTVSV Scheme, 2024 where the petitioner failed to deposit the amount specified in Form-3 and contends that this default triggers automatic revival of previously withdrawn revision petitions. The court applied the principle of automatic revival of prior adverse orders upon failure of a statutory declaration, restoring the parties to their pre-declaration positions and holding the respondents' refusal (based on no pending revision petitions) to be legally erroneous. The impugned order is set aside; petitioner is directed to approach respondents within thirty days to complete formalities to avail the scheme for tax arrears and penalty.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
