Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Dispute concerns eligibility for the DTVSV Scheme, 2024 where the petitioner failed to deposit the amount specified in Form-3 and contends that this default triggers automatic revival of previously withdrawn revision petitions. The court applied the principle of automatic revival of prior adverse orders upon failure of a statutory declaration, restoring the parties to their pre-declaration positions and holding the respondents' refusal (based on no pending revision petitions) to be legally erroneous. The impugned order is set aside; petitioner is directed to approach respondents within thirty days to complete formalities to avail the scheme for tax arrears and penalty.
Dispute concerns eligibility for the DTVSV Scheme, 2024 where the petitioner failed to deposit the amount specified in Form-3 and contends that this default triggers automatic revival of previously withdrawn revision petitions. The court applied the principle of automatic revival of prior adverse orders upon failure of a statutory declaration, restoring the parties to their pre-declaration positions and holding the respondents' refusal (based on no pending revision petitions) to be legally erroneous. The impugned order is set aside; petitioner is directed to approach respondents within thirty days to complete formalities to avail the scheme for tax arrears and penalty.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
