Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Dispute concerns eligibility for the DTVSV Scheme, 2024 where the petitioner failed to deposit the amount specified in Form-3 and contends that this default triggers automatic revival of previously withdrawn revision petitions. The court applied the principle of automatic revival of prior adverse orders upon failure of a statutory declaration, restoring the parties to their pre-declaration positions and holding the respondents' refusal (based on no pending revision petitions) to be legally erroneous. The impugned order is set aside; petitioner is directed to approach respondents within thirty days to complete formalities to avail the scheme for tax arrears and penalty.
Dispute concerns eligibility for the DTVSV Scheme, 2024 where the petitioner failed to deposit the amount specified in Form-3 and contends that this default triggers automatic revival of previously withdrawn revision petitions. The court applied the principle of automatic revival of prior adverse orders upon failure of a statutory declaration, restoring the parties to their pre-declaration positions and holding the respondents' refusal (based on no pending revision petitions) to be legally erroneous. The impugned order is set aside; petitioner is directed to approach respondents within thirty days to complete formalities to avail the scheme for tax arrears and penalty.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
