Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Dispute concerns entitlement to interest on delayed refund where the assessing officer denied interest by alleging a lapse in claiming TDS in a revised return. The legal principle stated is that exclusion of any period for calculating interest must be determined by the authority designated under the relevant statute; the AO lacks power to unilaterally disallow interest on that ground. The AO's terse finding was treated as erroneous; the appellate authority accepted the taxpayer's explanation regarding Form 26AS and held there was no lapse in claiming the credit.
Dispute concerns entitlement to interest on delayed refund where the assessing officer denied interest by alleging a lapse in claiming TDS in a revised return. The legal principle stated is that exclusion of any period for calculating interest must be determined by the authority designated under the relevant statute; the AO lacks power to unilaterally disallow interest on that ground. The AO's terse finding was treated as erroneous; the appellate authority accepted the taxpayer's explanation regarding Form 26AS and held there was no lapse in claiming the credit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
