Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Continuing offence of money-laundering: discharge set aside and proceedings reinstated where laundering continued after inclusion of predicate offence...
Dispute concerns entitlement to interest on delayed refund where the assessing officer denied interest by alleging a lapse in claiming TDS in a revised return. The legal principle stated is that exclusion of any period for calculating interest must be determined by the authority designated under the relevant statute; the AO lacks power to unilaterally disallow interest on that ground. The AO's terse finding was treated as erroneous; the appellate authority accepted the taxpayer's explanation regarding Form 26AS and held there was no lapse in claiming the credit.
Dispute concerns entitlement to interest on delayed refund where the assessing officer denied interest by alleging a lapse in claiming TDS in a revised return. The legal principle stated is that exclusion of any period for calculating interest must be determined by the authority designated under the relevant statute; the AO lacks power to unilaterally disallow interest on that ground. The AO's terse finding was treated as erroneous; the appellate authority accepted the taxpayer's explanation regarding Form 26AS and held there was no lapse in claiming the credit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
