Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The issue is whether the assessee was an agent of an NRI partner such that income received by a partnership would be attributable to the assessee; the tribunal found the development agreement was with the partnership firm (five partners) not the individual NRI, there was no direct or indirect contractual or business connection between the assessee and the NRI partner, and income flowed to partners from the firm; therefore the tax authority failed to establish agency and the addition made invoking agent-attribution provisions was deleted in favour of the assessee.
The issue is whether the assessee was an agent of an NRI partner such that income received by a partnership would be attributable to the assessee; the tribunal found the development agreement was with the partnership firm (five partners) not the individual NRI, there was no direct or indirect contractual or business connection between the assessee and the NRI partner, and income flowed to partners from the firm; therefore the tax authority failed to establish agency and the addition made invoking agent-attribution provisions was deleted in favour of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
