Fraudulent trading requires cogent evidence of intent to defraud; ordinary-course payments protected, except post-insolvency withdrawals must be resto...
Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5681 to 5700 of 96207 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The issue is whether the assessee was an agent of an NRI partner such that income received by a partnership would be attributable to the assessee; the tribunal found the development agreement was with the partnership firm (five partners) not the individual NRI, there was no direct or indirect contractual or business connection between the assessee and the NRI partner, and income flowed to partners from the firm; therefore the tax authority failed to establish agency and the addition made invoking agent-attribution provisions was deleted in favour of the assessee.
The issue is whether the assessee was an agent of an NRI partner such that income received by a partnership would be attributable to the assessee; the tribunal found the development agreement was with the partnership firm (five partners) not the individual NRI, there was no direct or indirect contractual or business connection between the assessee and the NRI partner, and income flowed to partners from the firm; therefore the tax authority failed to establish agency and the addition made invoking agent-attribution provisions was deleted in favour of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.