Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Where an assessee files an application to withdraw an appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) remains obliged to decide the appeal on its merits within the parameters of section 251(1)(a); dismissing the appeal in limine without merit-based consideration is contrary to that duty. The impugned CIT(A) order was set aside and all issues restored for de novo adjudication; CIT(A) must provide the assessee an opportunity to be heard and decide the appeal on merits. The appellate position is restored and the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.
Where an assessee files an application to withdraw an appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) remains obliged to decide the appeal on its merits within the parameters of section 251(1)(a); dismissing the appeal in limine without merit-based consideration is contrary to that duty. The impugned CIT(A) order was set aside and all issues restored for de novo adjudication; CIT(A) must provide the assessee an opportunity to be heard and decide the appeal on merits. The appellate position is restored and the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
