Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Issue estoppel applies in criminal proceedings where an earlier adjudication has distinctly raised or found the same issue, and parties are precluded from advancing legally inconsistent allegations; the court applied this principle to dismiss as barred a later complaint founded on the same letters and facts as an earlier complaint that was finally decided on merits as non-maintainable under company law. The earlier dismissal on merits operated as an estoppel against relitigation, and the subsequent complaint and related orders were quashed with the petition disposed of.
Issue estoppel applies in criminal proceedings where an earlier adjudication has distinctly raised or found the same issue, and parties are precluded from advancing legally inconsistent allegations; the court applied this principle to dismiss as barred a later complaint founded on the same letters and facts as an earlier complaint that was finally decided on merits as non-maintainable under company law. The earlier dismissal on merits operated as an estoppel against relitigation, and the subsequent complaint and related orders were quashed with the petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.