Concessional Basic Customs Duty on Ethernet switches: classification as enterprise switches upheld, challenge dismissed for lack of substantial law qu...
Insolvency petition based on admitted debt and default upheld; challenge for malicious initiation rejected, settlement may proceed under resolution fr...
Quashing of FIR and challenge to ECIR over alleged diversion of funds and preferential ESOP pricing dismissed after prima facie money-laundering findi...
Reopening of assessment based solely on an audit party's...
Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision should be considered.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Reopening of assessment based solely on an audit party's objection does not satisfy the statutory 'reason to believe' required for reassessment; the audit objection is characterised as an expert opinion and its reliance amounts to a mere change of opinion. The assessing officer's prior detailed scrutiny and disallowance of exemption under Section 80-IA after threadbare inquiry precluded invoking reassessment provisions where the same issue had been considered from all conceivable angles. Where omission arose from the AO's inability to envisage a point, that does not confer power to reopen under reassessment provisions; the departmental remedy available was power of revision rather than reassessment.
Reopening of assessment based solely on an audit party's objection does not satisfy the statutory 'reason to believe' required for reassessment; the audit objection is characterised as an expert opinion and its reliance amounts to a mere change of opinion. The assessing officer's prior detailed scrutiny and disallowance of exemption under Section 80-IA after threadbare inquiry precluded invoking reassessment provisions where the same issue had been considered from all conceivable angles. Where omission arose from the AO's inability to envisage a point, that does not confer power to reopen under reassessment provisions; the departmental remedy available was power of revision rather than reassessment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
