Tariff classification determines GST schedule and rate; beverages in Schedule III attract the higher rate, tea extracts and syrups in Schedule I attra...
Fraudulent trading requires cogent evidence of intent to defraud; ordinary-course payments protected, except post-insolvency withdrawals must be resto...
Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Revisionary jurisdiction was exercised where the Principal Commissioner found the trust deed empowered the trustee to add any person or charity to the class of beneficiaries, so benefits were not restricted to relatives; accordingly sums received could fall under the chargeable head invoked by the revising officer. The Tribunal agreed that the Assessing Officer failed to verify the genuineness of the trust's claim and did not form an express plausible view, making the AO's order erroneous and prejudicial and justifying revision under the statute; the assessee was given a chance to produce supporting evidence and the appeal was dismissed.
Revisionary jurisdiction was exercised where the Principal Commissioner found the trust deed empowered the trustee to add any person or charity to the class of beneficiaries, so benefits were not restricted to relatives; accordingly sums received could fall under the chargeable head invoked by the revising officer. The Tribunal agreed that the Assessing Officer failed to verify the genuineness of the trust's claim and did not form an express plausible view, making the AO's order erroneous and prejudicial and justifying revision under the statute; the assessee was given a chance to produce supporting evidence and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
