Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
Revision under Section 263 was held vitiated where the revisional opinion reallocating R&D expenditure to eligible undertakings rested on presumption and conjecture rather than concrete evidence; the Assessing Officer had conducted a full enquiry and permissibly allowed the R&D deduction. The Tribunal found the revisionary exercise to be materially influenced by an audit objection and not an independent satisfaction, quashed the revision order and restored the assessment order of the AO, allowing the assessee's appeal.
Revision under Section 263 was held vitiated where the revisional opinion reallocating R&D expenditure to eligible undertakings rested on presumption and conjecture rather than concrete evidence; the Assessing Officer had conducted a full enquiry and permissibly allowed the R&D deduction. The Tribunal found the revisionary exercise to be materially influenced by an audit objection and not an independent satisfaction, quashed the revision order and restored the assessment order of the AO, allowing the assessee's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
