Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Revisionary power under section 263 was examined in relation to a disallowance under section 11 for payments to specified/related persons; ITAT held the revisional authority failed to conduct its own enquiry and improperly remanded the matter for fresh verification, which constitutes an impermissible roving inquiry. The Assessing Officer had sought and considered detailed explanations and documents from the assessee before passing the assessment, and no material demonstrated falsity or discrepancy. Because no prejudice to revenue arose (taxes paid by specified persons and no taxable income in trust), the CIT(E)'s revision was set aside and the assessee's grounds allowed.
Revisionary power under section 263 was examined in relation to a disallowance under section 11 for payments to specified/related persons; ITAT held the revisional authority failed to conduct its own enquiry and improperly remanded the matter for fresh verification, which constitutes an impermissible roving inquiry. The Assessing Officer had sought and considered detailed explanations and documents from the assessee before passing the assessment, and no material demonstrated falsity or discrepancy. Because no prejudice to revenue arose (taxes paid by specified persons and no taxable income in trust), the CIT(E)'s revision was set aside and the assessee's grounds allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.