Inventory write-off and fraudulent/wrongful trading allegations in corporate insolvency led to director liability principles applied and appeal dismis...
Condonation of delay in filing GSTR-3B returns and entitlement to Section 62 benefit results in withdrawal of assessments and revocation of attachment...
Application under Section 7 of the IBC must disclose the necessary ingredients and materially conform to Form I, but insignificant omissions do not mandate rejection where supporting materials establish default. Debt restructuring and subsequent working capital consortium agreements that acknowledge past liabilities can renew the debt and reset the relevant date(s) of default, thereby extending limitation under the Limitation Act through acknowledgement; where such acknowledgement appears in balance sheets and executed agreements within the limitation period, the Section 7 filing is timely. Pendency of parallel proceedings or counterclaims, or allegations of mala fide purpose, do not automatically bar invocation of IBC. Appeal dismissed.
Application under Section 7 of the IBC must disclose the necessary ingredients and materially conform to Form I, but insignificant omissions do not mandate rejection where supporting materials establish default. Debt restructuring and subsequent working capital consortium agreements that acknowledge past liabilities can renew the debt and reset the relevant date(s) of default, thereby extending limitation under the Limitation Act through acknowledgement; where such acknowledgement appears in balance sheets and executed agreements within the limitation period, the Section 7 filing is timely. Pendency of parallel proceedings or counterclaims, or allegations of mala fide purpose, do not automatically bar invocation of IBC. Appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.