Admissibility of recorded statements and electronic evidence: CESTAT excludes non compliant statements and email printouts and sets aside revaluation ...
Corporate guarantee invocation in insolvency petition: enforceability upheld, conditional sanction letter not a novation, limitation not barred after ...
Application under Section 7 of the IBC must disclose the necessary ingredients and materially conform to Form I, but insignificant omissions do not mandate rejection where supporting materials establish default. Debt restructuring and subsequent working capital consortium agreements that acknowledge past liabilities can renew the debt and reset the relevant date(s) of default, thereby extending limitation under the Limitation Act through acknowledgement; where such acknowledgement appears in balance sheets and executed agreements within the limitation period, the Section 7 filing is timely. Pendency of parallel proceedings or counterclaims, or allegations of mala fide purpose, do not automatically bar invocation of IBC. Appeal dismissed.
Application under Section 7 of the IBC must disclose the necessary ingredients and materially conform to Form I, but insignificant omissions do not mandate rejection where supporting materials establish default. Debt restructuring and subsequent working capital consortium agreements that acknowledge past liabilities can renew the debt and reset the relevant date(s) of default, thereby extending limitation under the Limitation Act through acknowledgement; where such acknowledgement appears in balance sheets and executed agreements within the limitation period, the Section 7 filing is timely. Pendency of parallel proceedings or counterclaims, or allegations of mala fide purpose, do not automatically bar invocation of IBC. Appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
