Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
81 to 100 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A sanctioned scheme of arrangement, approved with requisite creditor consent, operates as a binding novation that resolves antecedent debt and precludes initiation of insolvency proceedings under Section 7 when sanction predates the admission; Section 391(3) and (6) principles bind parties and stay coercive action. Where objections and a stay on recall of sanction were pending before a higher bench and the petitioner failed to disclose the sanction, the adjudicating authority should have deferred exercising its discretionary power under Section 7 until appellate disposal. Consequently the admission under Section 7 was set aside while the Section 7 petition is to be kept pending for reconsideration after the appellate outcome.
A sanctioned scheme of arrangement, approved with requisite creditor consent, operates as a binding novation that resolves antecedent debt and precludes initiation of insolvency proceedings under Section 7 when sanction predates the admission; Section 391(3) and (6) principles bind parties and stay coercive action. Where objections and a stay on recall of sanction were pending before a higher bench and the petitioner failed to disclose the sanction, the adjudicating authority should have deferred exercising its discretionary power under Section 7 until appellate disposal. Consequently the admission under Section 7 was set aside while the Section 7 petition is to be kept pending for reconsideration after the appellate outcome.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.