Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Under Section 144C the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) should have dismissed the petitioner's objections simpliciter because a final assessment order had already been passed; therefore the DRP's findings on whether the objections were intimated to the assessing officer were unwarranted. The operative effect directed is that those DRP observations shall not be considered by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), who must decide the taxpayer's appeal against the final assessment order without being influenced by the impugned DRP order.
Under Section 144C the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) should have dismissed the petitioner's objections simpliciter because a final assessment order had already been passed; therefore the DRP's findings on whether the objections were intimated to the assessing officer were unwarranted. The operative effect directed is that those DRP observations shall not be considered by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), who must decide the taxpayer's appeal against the final assessment order without being influenced by the impugned DRP order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
