Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Continuing offence of money-laundering: discharge set aside and proceedings reinstated where laundering continued after inclusion of predicate offence...
After amendment to Explanation 1(c), eligibility as a venture capital undertaking must be determined strictly with reference to the SEBI Venture Capital Fund Regulations, 1996; on that regulatory and factual matrix the entity in question meets the regulatory description and is not within the negative list, so statutory eligibility is satisfied. Denial of exemption solely because commercial hospital operations had not commenced was rejected as inconsistent with the legislative aim to promote capital in sectors with inherent gestation. The income from the fund's qualifying investments therefore qualified for the statutory tax exemption.
After amendment to Explanation 1(c), eligibility as a venture capital undertaking must be determined strictly with reference to the SEBI Venture Capital Fund Regulations, 1996; on that regulatory and factual matrix the entity in question meets the regulatory description and is not within the negative list, so statutory eligibility is satisfied. Denial of exemption solely because commercial hospital operations had not commenced was rejected as inconsistent with the legislative aim to promote capital in sectors with inherent gestation. The income from the fund's qualifying investments therefore qualified for the statutory tax exemption.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
