Inventory write-off and fraudulent/wrongful trading allegations in corporate insolvency led to director liability principles applied and appeal dismis...
Condonation of delay in filing GSTR-3B returns and entitlement to Section 62 benefit results in withdrawal of assessments and revocation of attachment...
After amendment to Explanation 1(c), eligibility as a venture capital undertaking must be determined strictly with reference to the SEBI Venture Capital Fund Regulations, 1996; on that regulatory and factual matrix the entity in question meets the regulatory description and is not within the negative list, so statutory eligibility is satisfied. Denial of exemption solely because commercial hospital operations had not commenced was rejected as inconsistent with the legislative aim to promote capital in sectors with inherent gestation. The income from the fund's qualifying investments therefore qualified for the statutory tax exemption.
After amendment to Explanation 1(c), eligibility as a venture capital undertaking must be determined strictly with reference to the SEBI Venture Capital Fund Regulations, 1996; on that regulatory and factual matrix the entity in question meets the regulatory description and is not within the negative list, so statutory eligibility is satisfied. Denial of exemption solely because commercial hospital operations had not commenced was rejected as inconsistent with the legislative aim to promote capital in sectors with inherent gestation. The income from the fund's qualifying investments therefore qualified for the statutory tax exemption.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
