Insolvency petition based on admitted debt and default upheld; challenge for malicious initiation rejected, settlement may proceed under resolution fr...
Quashing of FIR and challenge to ECIR over alleged diversion of funds and preferential ESOP pricing dismissed after prima facie money-laundering findi...
After amendment to Explanation 1(c), eligibility as a venture capital undertaking must be determined strictly with reference to the SEBI Venture Capital Fund Regulations, 1996; on that regulatory and factual matrix the entity in question meets the regulatory description and is not within the negative list, so statutory eligibility is satisfied. Denial of exemption solely because commercial hospital operations had not commenced was rejected as inconsistent with the legislative aim to promote capital in sectors with inherent gestation. The income from the fund's qualifying investments therefore qualified for the statutory tax exemption.
After amendment to Explanation 1(c), eligibility as a venture capital undertaking must be determined strictly with reference to the SEBI Venture Capital Fund Regulations, 1996; on that regulatory and factual matrix the entity in question meets the regulatory description and is not within the negative list, so statutory eligibility is satisfied. Denial of exemption solely because commercial hospital operations had not commenced was rejected as inconsistent with the legislative aim to promote capital in sectors with inherent gestation. The income from the fund's qualifying investments therefore qualified for the statutory tax exemption.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
