Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The note addresses whether documents seized from a person other than the assessee fall within the phrase 'found in the course of search' and thus may support assessment under section 153A; it records that such material (seized from an employee covered by the same search) is within that scope, but stresses that for an unabated assessment additions under 153A require incriminating material unearthed by the search. The seized document was held non incriminating, and therefore the 153A assessment based on it is invalid; a late challenge to approval and introduction of fresh appellate grounds was rejected for want of record support.
The note addresses whether documents seized from a person other than the assessee fall within the phrase 'found in the course of search' and thus may support assessment under section 153A; it records that such material (seized from an employee covered by the same search) is within that scope, but stresses that for an unabated assessment additions under 153A require incriminating material unearthed by the search. The seized document was held non incriminating, and therefore the 153A assessment based on it is invalid; a late challenge to approval and introduction of fresh appellate grounds was rejected for want of record support.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.