Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The note addresses whether documents seized from a person other than the assessee fall within the phrase 'found in the course of search' and thus may support assessment under section 153A; it records that such material (seized from an employee covered by the same search) is within that scope, but stresses that for an unabated assessment additions under 153A require incriminating material unearthed by the search. The seized document was held non incriminating, and therefore the 153A assessment based on it is invalid; a late challenge to approval and introduction of fresh appellate grounds was rejected for want of record support.
The note addresses whether documents seized from a person other than the assessee fall within the phrase 'found in the course of search' and thus may support assessment under section 153A; it records that such material (seized from an employee covered by the same search) is within that scope, but stresses that for an unabated assessment additions under 153A require incriminating material unearthed by the search. The seized document was held non incriminating, and therefore the 153A assessment based on it is invalid; a late challenge to approval and introduction of fresh appellate grounds was rejected for want of record support.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.