Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Statements recorded under inquiry summons are admissible only if...
Admissibility of inquiry statements: such statements require formal examination and admission before the adjudicating authority, or they are inadmissible.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Statements recorded under inquiry summons are admissible only if the witness is examined before the adjudicating authority and the authority forms an opinion to admit them; failure to follow the mandatory procedure for admitting inquiry statements under the Customs/central excise regime renders such statements inadmissible. Consequently, penalty for alleged abetment under the Customs penalty provision could not be sustained where the impugned order relied solely on section 108 statements without complying with the statutory admission and cross examination safeguards, and the penalty was set aside.
Statements recorded under inquiry summons are admissible only if the witness is examined before the adjudicating authority and the authority forms an opinion to admit them; failure to follow the mandatory procedure for admitting inquiry statements under the Customs/central excise regime renders such statements inadmissible. Consequently, penalty for alleged abetment under the Customs penalty provision could not be sustained where the impugned order relied solely on section 108 statements without complying with the statutory admission and cross examination safeguards, and the penalty was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.