Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Notification No.45/2017-Cus exemption applies to integrated tax (IGST) where 'duty of customs' is interpreted to encompass IGST; the Tribunal analysed the Customs Act definition of duty, the IGST Act definition of integrated tax and levy/collection mechanics, and concluded appellants are entitled to IGST exemption under Notification No.45/2017-Cus. It treated Notification No.36/2021-Cus challenge as affecting validity; prior tribunal and High Court decisions found Notification No.36/2021-Cus ultra vires. Consequent assessments denying IGST exemption were set aside and the appellants' appeals were allowed while Revenue appeals were rejected.
Notification No.45/2017-Cus exemption applies to integrated tax (IGST) where 'duty of customs' is interpreted to encompass IGST; the Tribunal analysed the Customs Act definition of duty, the IGST Act definition of integrated tax and levy/collection mechanics, and concluded appellants are entitled to IGST exemption under Notification No.45/2017-Cus. It treated Notification No.36/2021-Cus challenge as affecting validity; prior tribunal and High Court decisions found Notification No.36/2021-Cus ultra vires. Consequent assessments denying IGST exemption were set aside and the appellants' appeals were allowed while Revenue appeals were rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.