Reopening Assessments invalid where satisfaction and jurisdictional approval are absent for third party seized material, leading to quashing of assess...
Benami property exclusion from the insolvency estate: Benami Act proceedings preclude IBC tribunals from reopening attachments or treating such assets...
Exclusion of limitation period: pandemic suspension plus debtor acknowledgement can extend limitation, requiring fresh factfinding on guarantee invoca...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5861 to 5880 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Notification No.45/2017-Cus exemption applies to integrated tax (IGST) where 'duty of customs' is interpreted to encompass IGST; the Tribunal analysed the Customs Act definition of duty, the IGST Act definition of integrated tax and levy/collection mechanics, and concluded appellants are entitled to IGST exemption under Notification No.45/2017-Cus. It treated Notification No.36/2021-Cus challenge as affecting validity; prior tribunal and High Court decisions found Notification No.36/2021-Cus ultra vires. Consequent assessments denying IGST exemption were set aside and the appellants' appeals were allowed while Revenue appeals were rejected.
Notification No.45/2017-Cus exemption applies to integrated tax (IGST) where 'duty of customs' is interpreted to encompass IGST; the Tribunal analysed the Customs Act definition of duty, the IGST Act definition of integrated tax and levy/collection mechanics, and concluded appellants are entitled to IGST exemption under Notification No.45/2017-Cus. It treated Notification No.36/2021-Cus challenge as affecting validity; prior tribunal and High Court decisions found Notification No.36/2021-Cus ultra vires. Consequent assessments denying IGST exemption were set aside and the appellants' appeals were allowed while Revenue appeals were rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.