Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Notification No.45/2017-Cus exemption applies to integrated tax (IGST) where 'duty of customs' is interpreted to encompass IGST; the Tribunal analysed the Customs Act definition of duty, the IGST Act definition of integrated tax and levy/collection mechanics, and concluded appellants are entitled to IGST exemption under Notification No.45/2017-Cus. It treated Notification No.36/2021-Cus challenge as affecting validity; prior tribunal and High Court decisions found Notification No.36/2021-Cus ultra vires. Consequent assessments denying IGST exemption were set aside and the appellants' appeals were allowed while Revenue appeals were rejected.
Notification No.45/2017-Cus exemption applies to integrated tax (IGST) where 'duty of customs' is interpreted to encompass IGST; the Tribunal analysed the Customs Act definition of duty, the IGST Act definition of integrated tax and levy/collection mechanics, and concluded appellants are entitled to IGST exemption under Notification No.45/2017-Cus. It treated Notification No.36/2021-Cus challenge as affecting validity; prior tribunal and High Court decisions found Notification No.36/2021-Cus ultra vires. Consequent assessments denying IGST exemption were set aside and the appellants' appeals were allowed while Revenue appeals were rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.