Reversal of input tax credit in proportion to exempt supply: specificity of show-cause notice required; order set aside, fresh proceedings allowed wit...
Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Financial debt characterization was examined for payments described as share subscription money; the rules exclude share subscription amounts from the definition of deposit under Rule 2(c)(vii) of the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014, and therefore such payments do not convert into financial debt permitting invocation of the Insolvency Code. An acknowledgment in the debtor's books was considered but found insufficient to alter character into financial debt. Resultantly the tribunal found no financial debt enabling a petition under insolvency law and dismissed the appeal.
Financial debt characterization was examined for payments described as share subscription money; the rules exclude share subscription amounts from the definition of deposit under Rule 2(c)(vii) of the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014, and therefore such payments do not convert into financial debt permitting invocation of the Insolvency Code. An acknowledgment in the debtor's books was considered but found insufficient to alter character into financial debt. Resultantly the tribunal found no financial debt enabling a petition under insolvency law and dismissed the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.