Mis-declaration in import descriptions must be deliberate to justify confiscation; withheld contemporaneous import documents invalidate value redeterm...
Liability for EPCG export shortfall: duty and interest sustained, but confiscation and penalties quashed where no fraud and causes beyond importer con...
Financial debt characterization was examined for payments described as share subscription money; the rules exclude share subscription amounts from the definition of deposit under Rule 2(c)(vii) of the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014, and therefore such payments do not convert into financial debt permitting invocation of the Insolvency Code. An acknowledgment in the debtor's books was considered but found insufficient to alter character into financial debt. Resultantly the tribunal found no financial debt enabling a petition under insolvency law and dismissed the appeal.
Financial debt characterization was examined for payments described as share subscription money; the rules exclude share subscription amounts from the definition of deposit under Rule 2(c)(vii) of the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014, and therefore such payments do not convert into financial debt permitting invocation of the Insolvency Code. An acknowledgment in the debtor's books was considered but found insufficient to alter character into financial debt. Resultantly the tribunal found no financial debt enabling a petition under insolvency law and dismissed the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.