Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Continuing offence of money-laundering: discharge set aside and proceedings reinstated where laundering continued after inclusion of predicate offence...
At admission of a CIRP petition the tribunal cannot decide liquidated damages by summary procedure; such claims are not amenable to summary determination and therefore do not justify denial of admission on that ground alone. Pre-existing contractual disputes about quality and defects, if shown to be substantial, genuine and bona fide (not spurious, speculative or misconceived), can bar admission of a Section 9 application; numerous pre-demand communications indicating defects support that finding. A completion certificate issued with caveats does not amount to unconditional acceptance and does not foreclose contractual disputes. The appeal challenging these conclusions was dismissed.
At admission of a CIRP petition the tribunal cannot decide liquidated damages by summary procedure; such claims are not amenable to summary determination and therefore do not justify denial of admission on that ground alone. Pre-existing contractual disputes about quality and defects, if shown to be substantial, genuine and bona fide (not spurious, speculative or misconceived), can bar admission of a Section 9 application; numerous pre-demand communications indicating defects support that finding. A completion certificate issued with caveats does not amount to unconditional acceptance and does not foreclose contractual disputes. The appeal challenging these conclusions was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.